Valuing Lives Equally and Welfare Economics
David Canning ()
PGDA Working Papers from Program on the Global Demography of Aging
Welfare economics, in the form of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis, is at present internally inconsistent and ethically unappealing. We address these issues by proposing two ethical axioms: society prefers Pareto improvements and society values lives lived at a "standard" level of health and income equally. We show that there exists a unique social preference ordering satisfying these axioms. Welfare economics is reconstructed to produce rankings consistent with this social preference ordering. The result is we should always measure willingness to pay in life years, not money units. A standardized life year becomes an interpersonally comparable unit of value.
Keywords: aging; health; welfare economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/pgda/WorkingPapers/2007/PGDA_WP_27_2007.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/pgda/WorkingPapers/2007/PGDA_WP_27_2007.pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gdm:wpaper:2707
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in PGDA Working Papers from Program on the Global Demography of Aging
Series data maintained by Cinzia Smothers (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .