Social Mobility Explains Populism, Not Inequality or Culture

Eric S. M. Protzer ()
Additional contact information
Eric S. M. Protzer: Center for Global Development

No 146, Growth Lab Working Papers from Harvard's Growth Lab

Abstract: What explains contemporary developed-world populism? A largely-overlooked hypothesis, advanced herein, is economic unfairness. This idea holds that humans do not simply care about the magnitudes of final outcomes such as losses or inequalities. They care deeply about whether each individual’s economic outcomes occur for fair reasons. Thus citizens turn to populism when they do not get the economic opportunities and outcomes they think they fairly deserve. A series of cross-sectional regressions show that low social mobility – an important type of economic unfairness – consistently correlates with the geography of populism, both within and across developed countries. Conversely, income and wealth inequality do not; and neither do the prominent cultural hypotheses of immigrant stocks, social media use, nor the share of seniors in the population. Collectively, this evidence underlines the importance of economic fairness, and suggests that academics and policymakers should pay greater attention to normative, moral questions about the economy.

Keywords: Inclusive Growth; Populism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-09
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/files/growthlab/ ... -revision-2021-5.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:glh:wpfacu:146

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Growth Lab Working Papers from Harvard's Growth Lab
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chuck McKenney ().