EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A critique to the expansionary austerity (part III): empirical counter facts beyond theoretical weaknesses

Alberto Botta () and Daniele Tori ()

No 16387, Greenwich Papers in Political Economy from University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre

Abstract: In two previous contributions published in this working paper series, we pointed out the theoretical fragilities of the expansionary austerity theory (EAT). In this paper, we develop our critique even further by integrating the above theoretical investigation with an econometric model testing for the effectiveness of the mechanisms at the basis of the EAT. We consider a sample of developed economies composed by both monetarily sovereign and non-monetarily sovereign countries. Our time spell runs from 2007 to 2016 since that we are interested to assess the solidity of the EAT postulates in the post-crisis period. Our findings reinforce the validity of our original critique, and are fully consistent with out theoretical model. Since 2007, the core mechanisms of the expansionary austerity theory were not at work, to say the least. Austerity measures did not provide any expansionary impulse to economic activity since that the “expectation”, “financial” and “external” channels were inactive at best, or they acted in the opposite direction with respect to what EAT advocates would have suggested. Further, austerity per se did not restore any sense of credibility about public finance solidity on financial markets. Rather, it exacerbated financial turbulences and speculation on the market for sovereign bonds. Interestingly, austerity measures delivered perverse results precisely in those non-monetarily sovereign countries where they were thought to be mostly effective.

Keywords: Fiscal policy; Expansionary austerity theory; Post-Keynesian macro models; Panel data (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E12 E61 E62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-02-26
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/16387/1/Paper%20Bo ... ori%20GPERC%2348.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/16387/1/Paper%20Botta%20and%20Tori%20GPERC%2348.pdf [302 Moved Temporarily]--> https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/16387/1/Paper%20Botta%20and%20Tori%20GPERC%2348.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gpe:wpaper:16387

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Greenwich Papers in Political Economy from University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nadine Edwards ().

 
Page updated 2020-11-29
Handle: RePEc:gpe:wpaper:16387