The Impact of REACH on Eco-Innovation: How Perception Misfits on Policy Stringency Matter

Nabila Arfaoui (), Eric Brouillat () and Maïder Saint-Jean

No 2015-45, GREDEG Working Papers from Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France

Abstract: This article provides new insights into the impact of various policy designs on firms' innovative activities of substituting dangerous chemicals with less damaging ones. Such a principle of substitution is at the heart of the REACH regulation enacted in 2007 to control potentially dangerous chemicals in the European Union (EU). In recent years, research scientists, government panels, and the popular press have denounced bisphenol-A (BPA) used in food packaging for its developmental effect as an endocrine disruptor. In this article, we develop an agent-based model (ABM) as an explorative tool to investigate how the policy design of REACH can help bring safer substitutes of bisphenols to market. We mimic the main mechanisms underlying REACH, suggest the importance of perceived stringency on eco-innovative activities, and address the issue of possible interaction among the various policy design aspects. The modeling exercise enables an analysis of misfits likely to emerge between objective and perceived stringency of regulation as well as misfits related to divergent perceptions between suppliers and clients. The model outcomes stress that the efficiency of severe regulation depends little on how agents perceive it; objective stringency is self-sufficient to stimulate technology transition. A severe regulation results in a stable oligopoly after experiencing an early but short turbulent phase because of the ban of the dangerous substance. This action calls for an assessment by policy makers of the necessary trade-offs between fast environmental and health benefits, temporary demand mismatches and higher market concentration. By contrast, the impact of a lenient regulation depends sorely on how agents perceive it. In particular, possible misfits in the perception of policy stringency between suppliers and clients may strengthen the efficiency of the regulation or, on the contrary, make it irrelevant. These findings highlight that the way stakeholders perceive the regulatory threat may be a key aspect to consider when fostering technological transition.

Keywords: technology substitution; perceived stringency; REACH regulation; bisphenols; agent-based model (ABM) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 pages
Date: 2015-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ino
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.gredeg.cnrs.fr/working-papers/GREDEG-WP-2015-45.pdf First version, 2015 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.gredeg.cnrs.fr:80 (A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.)

Related works:
Working Paper: The Impact of REACH on Eco-Innovation: How Perception Misfits on Policy Stringency Matter (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gre:wpaper:2015-45

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GREDEG Working Papers from Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Patrice Bougette ().