EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Pen Might Be Mightier than the Sword: How Third-party Advice or Sanction Impacts on Pro-environmental Behavior

Agnès Festré, Pierre Garrouste, Ankinée Kirakozian and Mira Toumi
Additional contact information
Agnès Festré: Université Côte d'Azur, France
Pierre Garrouste: Université Côte d'Azur, France
Ankinée Kirakozian: Université Côte d'Azur, France
Mira Toumi: Université Côte d'Azur, France

No 2017-15, GREDEG Working Papers from Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), University of Nice Sophia Antipolis

Abstract: It is recognized widely that incentives can influence the cooperation among individuals in the provision of public goods. The aim of this study is to adapt a public good game (PGG) to the environmental issue of waste management. We report an experiment where the players have to cooperate in order to reduce the cost of waste sorting treatment, modelled as a decrease in the tax rate. We consider a traditional PGG involving groups of four players. A fifth player representing the third-party is introduced in the incentivized treatments. The third-party can provide advice about the desired individual contribution (Advice Treatment), or can punish collectively noncooperative behaviors by increasing the tax rate (Sanction Treatment). Participants are asked also to perform an effort task to increase their given initial endowments. A social preference measure is introduced in the form of a social value orientation (SVO) test. We find that initially, advice, sanction and the threat of sanction significantly increase the average individual contribution level. However, applying a sanction has a stronger disciplinary effect. Also, we find results in line with Becker (1974)'s altruism hypothesis that under both sanction and threat of a sanction, high income individuals contribute more in absolute value than low income individuals.

Keywords: Waste sorting; Laboratory experiment; Advice; Sanction; Pro-social behavior (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q53 C91 D03 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-cdm, nep-env and nep-exp
Date: 2017-05, Revised 2017-08
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.gredeg.cnrs.fr/working-papers/GREDEG-WP-2017-15.pdf Revised version, 2017-08 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gre:wpaper:2017-15

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GREDEG Working Papers from Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), University of Nice Sophia Antipolis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Patrice Bougette ().

 
Page updated 2019-08-23
Handle: RePEc:gre:wpaper:2017-15