Expert judgment versus public opinion: evidence from the Eurovision Song Contest
Marco Haan (),
Gerhard Dijkstra and
Peter Dijkstra ()
No 200305, CCSO Working Papers from University of Groningen, CCSO Centre for Economic Research
For centuries, there have been discussions as to whether only experts can judge the quality of cultural output, or whether the taste of the public also has merit. This paper tries to resolve that question empirically, using national finals of the Eurovision Song Contest. We show that experts are better judges of quality: the outcome of finals judged by experts is less sensitive to factors unrelated to quality than the outcome of finals judged by public opinion. Yet, experts are not perfect: their judgment does still depend on such factors. This is also the case in the European finals of the contest
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Expert Judgment Versus Public Opinion – Evidence from the Eurovision Song Contest (2005)
Working Paper: Expert judgment versus public opinion - evidence from the Eurovision Song Contest (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gro:rugccs:200305
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CCSO Working Papers from University of Groningen, CCSO Centre for Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Hanneke Tamling ().