The Value of Risk: Measuring the Service Output of U.S. Commercial Banks
Susanto Basu (),
Robert Inklaar () and
J. Christina Wang
No GD-102, GGDC Research Memorandum from Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen
Rather than charging direct fees, banks often charge implicitly for their services via interest spreads. As a result, much of bank output has to be estimated indirectly. In contrast to current statistical practice, dynamic optimizing models of banks argue that compensation for bearing systematic risk is not part of bank output. We apply these models and find that between 1997 and 2007, in the U.S. National Accounts, on average, bank output is overestimated by 21 percent and GDP is overestimated by 0.3 percent. Moreover, compared with current methods, our new estimates imply more plausible estimates of the share of capital in income and the return on fixed capital.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: THE VALUE OF RISK: MEASURING THE SERVICE OUTPUT OF U.S. COMMERCIAL BANKS (2011)
Working Paper: The value of risk: measuring the service output of U. S. commercial banks (2008)
Working Paper: The Value of Risk: Measuring the Service Output of U.S. Commercial Banks (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gro:rugggd:gd-102
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in GGDC Research Memorandum from Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Hanneke Tamling ().