Firm Value, Firm Size and Income Smoothing
Yulius Kurnia Susanto ()
Additional contact information
Yulius Kurnia Susanto: Trisakti School of Management, Indonesia Author-2-Name: Arya Pradipta Author-2-Workplace-Name: Trisakti School of Management, Jl. Kyai Tapa No. 20, 11440, Jakarta, Indonesia Author-3-Name: Author-3-Workplace-Name: Author-4-Name: Author-4-Workplace-Name: Author-5-Name: Author-5-Workplace-Name: Author-6-Name: Author-6-Workplace-Name: Author-7-Name: Author-7-Workplace-Name: Author-8-Name: Author-8-Workplace-Name:
GATR Journals from Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise
Abstract:
Objective � Income smoothing is a form of earnings manipulation to show that the company's performance is good. Income smoothing can be detrimental to investors, because investors do not know the real financial position and fluctuations of the company. Management of the company engage in income smoothing because investors tend to focus only on the amount of profit reported without regard to the process of generating profits. The purpose of this research is to obtain empirical evidence about the effect of firm value and size on income smoothing. Methodology/Technique � The sample of the research includes manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2014-2016. The samples were determined using a purposive sampling method and there are 51 companies that meet the criteria used. This research uses a logistic regression method for data analysis. Findings � The results of the research show that the effect of firm value on income smoothing is positive and significant. Meanwhile, the effect of firm size on income smoothing is negative and significant. Companies that create value in the eyes of investors will try to retain their investors by engaging in income smoothing. Income smoothing will convince investors to invest in the company. Meanwhile, large companies that are convinced that investors will continue to invest do not typically engage in income smoothing. Novelty �This study proves that, in the context of agency theory, the principal's desires are not often aligned with the wishes of management which can give rise to agency costs, one of which occurs as a result of income smoothing. Further, firm size can minimize opportunist income smoothing actions. Type of Paper: Empirical.
JEL-codes: G32 M41 M49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 7
Date: 2019-03-16
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cfn and nep-sea
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Published in Journal of Finance and Banking Review, Volume 4, Issue 1
Downloads: (external link)
http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/pdf_files/J ... Kurnia%20Susanto.pdf (application/pdf)
http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/online_submission.html
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:jfbr151
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in GATR Journals from Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Prof. Dr. Abd Rahim Mohamad ().