Preferential Treatment may Hurt: Another Application of the All-Pay Auction

Rene Kirkegaard

No 1005, Working Papers from University of Guelph, Department of Economics and Finance

Abstract: In many contests a subset of contestants is granted preferential treatment which is presumably intended to be advantageous. Examples include affirmative action and biased procurement policies. In this paper, however, I show that some of the supposed beneficiaries may in fact become worse off when the favored group is diverse. The reason is that the other favored contestants become more aggressive, which may outweigh the advantage that is gained over contestants who do not receive preferential treatment. Likewise, a contestant may be made better off when a subset of his competitors is granted preferential treatment. The contest is modelled as an incomplete-information all-pay auction in which contestants have heterogenous and non-linear cost functions. Incomplete information is crucial for the results.

Keywords: Affirmative Action; All-Pay Auctions; Contests; Preferential Treatment. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D44 D82 J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30 pages
Date: 2010
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cta
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.uoguelph.ca/economics/repec/workingpapers/2010/2010-05.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gue:guelph:2010-5.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Guelph, Department of Economics and Finance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Stephen Kosempel ().