Paradigm depletion, knowledge production and research effort
Joao Faria (),
Damien Besancenot () and
Additional contact information
Joao Faria: IPED - Institute for Policy and Economic Development - UTEP - University of Texas [El Paso]
Andréas Novak: Department of Business Administration - University of Vienna [Vienna]
CEPN Working Papers from HAL
This paper deals with two elements of Thomas Kuhn (1962) ideas regarding paradigm: Depletion and resiliency. The possibility of paradigm depletion taking resilience into account, given the hierarchy among scientists, is modeled as a Stackelberg differential game between editors [leaders] and authors [followers]. A number of results emerge from the model: i) Paradigm depletion can be optimal; ii) The optimal editor's shadow price of potential knowledge must be non-positive, if it is positive, the editor is just a keeper of the orthodoxy rather than a scientist; iii) Editor's and/or researcher's impatience is always bad for science; iv) In equilibrium editor's behavior does not matter for optimal research effort, while only editor's behavior matter for the paradigm.
Keywords: Paradigm; Economics of science; Research effort (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00447302
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:cepnwp:halshs-00447302
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPN Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().