L'introduction de Free sur le marché des mobiles: essai d'analyse coûts-bénéfices

Pierre Kopp (pierre.kopp@univ-paris1.fr) and Rémy Prud'Homme
Additional contact information
Pierre Kopp: CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Rémy Prud'Homme: UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12

Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) from HAL

Abstract: The competition authority (ARCEP) authorized in 2011 the introduction of a fourth mobile operator (Free) alongside Orange, SFR and Bouygues. More competitors was expected to mean more competition, which was supposed to improve the efficiency of the sector. This choice was questioned by Deffains [2012] who showed that the introduction of Free would entail the destruction of 50.000 jobs. Conversely Thesmar and Landier [2012] expected from that measure the net creation of 16.000 to 30.000 jobs. These studies were focussed on the effect on employment. Here, we conduct a cost-benefit study that takes into account all the consequences of this measure to consumers, businesses and public finance. The arrival of Free has resulted in an annual increase of the consumer surplus of approximately € 1.2 billion. This gain is offset by a loss of a slightly higher amount for producers. But it is accompanied by a loss of about € 0.4 billion for public finance. In the end, the welfare impact of this decision is regrettable. The paper also discusses the reasons for which the benefits of competition were unlikely to materialize in the mobile phone sector.

Keywords: cost benefit analysis; competition policy; analyse coût-bénéfice; régulation de la concurrence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue d'économie politique, 2014, 124 (3), pp.409-436. ⟨10.3917/redp.243.0409⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-01044505

DOI: 10.3917/redp.243.0409

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).