Strategic influence in social networks
Michel Grabisch,
Antoine Mandel,
Agnieszka Rusinowska and
Emily Tanimura ()
Additional contact information
Emily Tanimura: CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) from HAL
Abstract:
We consider a model of influence with a set of non-strategic agents and two strategic agents. The non-strategic agents have initial opinions and are linked through a simply connected network. They update their opinions as in the DeGroot model. The two strategic agents have fixed opinions, 1 and 0 respectively, and are characterized by the magnitude of the impact they can exert on non-strategic agents. Each strategic agent forms a link with one non-strategic agent in order to alter the average opinion that eventually emerges in the network. This procedure defines a zero-sum game whose players are the two strategic agents and whose strategy set is the set of non-strategic agents. We focus on the existence and the characterization of equilibria in pure strategy in this setting. Simple examples show that the existence of a pure strategy equilibrium does depend on the structure of the network. The characterization of equilibrium we obtain emphasizes on the one hand the influenceability of target agents and on the other hand their centrality whose natural measure in our context defines a new concept, related to betweenness centrality, that we call intermediacy. We also show that in the case where the two strategic agents have the same impact, symmetric equilibria emerge as natural solutions whereas in the case where the impacts are uneven, the strategic players generally have differentiated equilibrium targets, the high-impacts agent focusing on centrality and the low-impact agent on influenceability.
Keywords: influence network; beliefs; DeGroot model; strategic player; equilibrium; réseaux d'influence; croyances; modèle de DeGroot; agents stratégiques; convergence; consensus; équilibre (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-gth, nep-mic, nep-net and nep-soc
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01158168v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Published in 2015
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01158168v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Strategic influence in social networks (2017)
Working Paper: Strategic influence in social networks (2017)
Working Paper: Strategic influence in social networks (2017)
Working Paper: Strategic influence in social networks (2015) 
Working Paper: Strategic influence in social networks (2015) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-01158168
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().