The Effects of De-energizing Ties in Organizations and How to Manage Them

Andrew Parker (), Alexandra Gerbasi () and Christine L. Porath ()
Additional contact information
Andrew Parker: MC - Management et Comportement - EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management
Alexandra Gerbasi: MTS - Management Technologique et Strategique - EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management
Christine L. Porath: McDonough School of Business - GU - Georgetown University [Washington]

Working paper serie RMT - Grenoble Ecole de Management from HAL

Abstract: While there is growing recognition about the role of informal networks in organizations and the importance of energizers in the workplace, chances are that managers and organizations are missing a potentially devastating expense: de-energizers. Over the past decade we've studied the effects of negative or de-energizing ties, defined as enduring, recurring set of negative judgments, feelings, and behavioral intentions towards another person. While de-energizing ties may represent a relatively small proportion of ties, they have a disproportionately potent effect on individuals, other employees, and teams within organizations. At the individual level de-energizing relationships can result in blocked opportunities, decreased motivation, and even organizational isolation. The consequences include decreased levels of thriving, lower performance, and increased likelihood of exit. The effects on others are very similar. Countless co-workers often get sucked into these negative situations. At the team level de-energizing ties can cause more conflict, lower team cohesion and trust, and decrease boundary spanning activity. The result is less access to critical information, a decrease in the ability to solve problems, and overall lower team performance. De-energizing ties are not insurmountable, though. Managerial actions, such as conflict resolution, training and mentoring, as well as staffing changes, can change the dynamics of informal organizational networks and minimize the effects of de-energizing ties. Likewise, individual actions such as better awareness and strategic management of one's own network can decrease the effects of de-energizing relationships. In this article we detail these and other recommendations for leaders and individuals to manage the effects of de-energizing ties

Date: 2012
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://hal.grenoble-em.com/hal-00848027
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hal.grenoble-em.com/hal-00848027/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:gemwpa:hal-00848027

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working paper serie RMT - Grenoble Ecole de Management from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().