Pesticide Use and Regulation: Making Economic Sense Out of an Externality and Regulation Nightmare

David Zilberman and Katrin Millock

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This article argues that the existing maze of pesticide policies reflects the multidimensionality of side effects of pesticide use that cannot be addressed by uniform policies. Pesticide policies will improve as (a) economic literacy among natural scientists and policymakers increases; (b) economic models of pesticide use and agricultural production in general better incorporate biological considerations; (c) benefit-cost criteria are introduced to determine regulations of pesticides; and (d) policies are enacted that take advantage of new information technologies and enable increased reporting of pesticide use. Moving from bans toward financial incentives and flexible policies that will allow chemical use where the benefit-cost ratios are high will improve resource allocation.

Keywords: environment; externalities; monitoring; pesticides; precision agriculture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Published in Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1997, 22(2), pp.Pages 321-332

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: PESTICIDE USE AND REGULATION: MAKING ECONOMIC SENSE OUT OF AN EXTERNALITY AND REGULATION NIGHTMARE (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00107244

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().