Routines et mémoire organisationnelle: un questionnement critique de la perspective cognitiviste
Nathalie Lazaric and
Pierre-André Mangolte
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
The aim of this article is to provide a better understanding of the concept of routines. Taking into account the theorical assumption of Nelson and Winter which has diffused this concept, we will try to show its evolution (Cohen et al., 1995). If routines are considered in 1982 as the locus of organizational memory, articulation of knowledge is far from to be perfect because of the presence of tacit knowledge. Recently, in the perspective of inductive learning, learning has been described with "mental models" and "production rules". These works, based on an articicial intelligence's approach coming from Simon, are describing learning in a computational dimension which seperates the body from the spirit. We will criticize this perspective by showing that tacit knowledge is not always included in cognitive maps but is included in technical artefacts and in operators bodies, as underlined by Rosenberg. This bring us to discuss other dimensions of organizational memory able to capture the diversity of tacit knowledge for integrating physical and cognitive activites in the process of routinization without excluding the interference of technical artefacts in this dynamic.
Keywords: Routine organizational memory; mental models; tacit knowledge; Routine; mémoire organisationnelle; Nelson et Winter; modèles mentaux; connaissance tacite (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Published in Revue Internationale de Systémique, 1998, vol.12, n°1, 1998, pp.27-49
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00130274
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().