Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences

Herrade Igersheim

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to defend Sen's Pareto liberal paradox by arguing in favor of developing a new formalism in terms of meta-ranking preferences. This entails enhancing the traditional structure of preferences by taking into consideration motivations and individual values. The aim is to prove the analysis of attempts to resolve the liberal-Pareto paradox, which we will undertake in the first instance. After showing that factoring in individual motivations justifies the meta-ranking of preferences, we will argue that a solution to the Pareto-liberal paradox must include this notion.

Keywords: Paretian liberal paradox; Collective choice; Metaranking of preferences; Paradoxe libéral-parétien; Choix collectif; Métaclassement des préférences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Recherches Economiques de Louvain - Louvain economic review, 2004, 73 (2), pp.173-192. ⟨10.3917/rel.732.0173⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences (2007)
Working Paper: Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences (2007)
Working Paper: Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00279227

DOI: 10.3917/rel.732.0173

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().