Division of labor and division of knowledge: Why the nature of the causality matters for the evolutionary theory of the firm

Markus Becker (), Patrick Cohendet () and Patrick Llerena
Additional contact information
Markus Becker: BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Patrick Cohendet: BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This article considers the role and interrelation of the division of labor and the division of knowledge, and its relevance for knowledge-based and evolutionary theories of the firm. As is well known, Adam Smith focused on the effect of the division of labor, while Charles Babbage focused on the effect of the division of knowledge. We are not the first to argue that both are connected in a loop, the division of labor guiding the division of knowledge via learning by doing, and the division of knowledge, in turn, guiding the development of competences for accomplishing steps of the work process. In this article, our main argument is that even knowledge-based and evolutionary approaches to the theory of the firm have focused more on the Smithian than the Babbagian part of the loop. We argue that the impact of the division of knowledge should not be glossed over and perhaps be considered first. The reason is that in the division of knowledge cognition enters the picture and makes a difference, amongst other things on the division of labor. Taking the division of knowledge into account also helps cast light on such important issues as understanding the emergence of routines.

Keywords: Division of labor; Division of knowledge; Charles Babbage; Adam Smith (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Uwe Cantner; Franco Malerba. Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation, Springer Verlag, pp.49-63, 2007, 978-3-540-49465-2_4. ⟨10.1007/978-3-540-49465-2_4⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Chapter: Division of labor and division of knowledge: Why the nature of the causality matters for the evolutionary theory of the firm (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00279499

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-49465-2_4

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().