Biproportion et offre dominante (A propos de l'article d'André Torre ‘Sur la signification théorique du modèle d'offre multisectoriel')

Louis de Mesnard

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: One replies here to partisans of the reject of the supply-driven model in input-output analysis and especially to A. Torre ( Revue Economique, 5, 44, 951-970). First of all, demand-driven hypothesis (Leontief) and supply-driven hypothesis (Ghosh) are symmetrical and incompatible, what forbidden to reject the second to the motive that it depends on the first. Secondly, the results earlier obtained for France of 1970 to 1985 from the method of the biproportionnal filter show that there is so much instability in the long term in the columns than in the rows of the flow matrix. Thirdly, the assimilation of the usage of allocation coefficients to the adoption of the supply-side model is excessive.

Keywords: Input-output; Leontief; Ghosh; Supply-driven; Offre dominante (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue Economique, 1996, 47 (1), pp.167-175

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Biproportion et offre dominante. A propos de l'article d'André Torre: "Sur la signification théorique du modèle d'offre multisectoriel." (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00383937

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().