EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Loss Aversion Under Prospect Theory: A Parameter-Free Measurement

Han Bleichrodt, C. Paraschiv and Mohammed Abdellaoui

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: A growing body of qualitative evidence shows that loss aversion, a phenomenon formalized in prospect theory, can explain a variety of field and experimental data. Quantifications of loss aversion are, however, hindered by the absence of a general preference-based method to elicit the utility for gains and losses simultaneously. This paper proposes such a method and uses it to measure loss aversion in an experimental study without making any parametric assumptions. Thus, it is the first to obtain a parameter-free elicitation of prospect theory's utility function on the whole domain. Our method also provides an efficient way to elicit utility midpoints, which are important in axiomatizations of utility. Several definitions of loss aversion have been put forward in the literature. According to most definitions we find strong evidence of loss aversion, at both the aggregate and the individual level. The degree of loss aversion varies with the definition used, which underlines the need for a commonly accepted definition of loss aversion.

Keywords: prospect theory; loss aversion; utility for gains and losses; elicitation of midpoints (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-10-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (301)

Published in Management Science, 2007, 53, n°10, pp.1659-1674. ⟨10.1287/mnsc.1070.0711⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Loss Aversion Under Prospect Theory: A Parameter-Free Measurement (2007) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00457047

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0711

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00457047