 Workouts, court-supervised reorganization and the choice between private and public debtPost-Print from HAL Abstract: This paper investigates the interaction between creditor structure and reorganization law. Private debt offers the advantage of flexible renegotiation out of court. Due to incomplete information and holdout incentives, the out-of-court renegotiation will typically fail for dispersed public debt. The introduction of Chapter 11-style renegotiation will benefit public debt firms and will be harmful for private debt firms. Moreover, Chapter 11 reduces the role of private debt in corporate borrowing in accordance with the US experience. The overall efficiency of a reorganization law is therefore ambiguous. Three prominent shortcomings of Chapter 11--its cost and delay, equity deviations and inefficient continuation--are shown to do little harm or even shown to be welfare-improving as they increase the incentives to renegotiate debt out of court and choose private debt. The effect of a low-cost reorganization procedure is more likely to be positive in a market-based financial system. Keywords: Private and public debt; Workouts; Reorganization law; Chapter 11; Absolute priority rule (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in Journal of Corporate Finance, 2003, Vol.9,n°2, pp.233-269. ⟨10.1016/S0929-1199(02)00002-0⟩ There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00459899 DOI: 10.1016/S0929-1199(02)00002-0 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Post-Print from HAL |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.