When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness

Kristina Dahlin and Deans M. Behrens
Additional contact information
Kristina Dahlin: Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto - University of Toronto
Deans M. Behrens: Department of Sociology - University of Toronto

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: We develop a valid definition of technological radicalness which states that a successful radical invention is: (1) novel; (2) unique; and (3) has an impact on future technology. The first two criteria allow us to identify potentially radical inventions ex ante market introduction; adding the third condition, we can ex post determine if an invention served as an important change agent. Empirically testable condition selected 6 of 581 tennis racket patents granted between 1971 and 2001. Two of the identified patents - the oversized and the wide-body rackets - are considered radical inventions by industry experts. Applying our definition and operationalization would allow researchers to achieve greater generalizability across studies, avoid endogenous definitions of radicalness, and study predictors of market success for radical inventions.

Keywords: Radical innovation; Operationalization; measurement; Patent citations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (159)

Published in Research Policy, 2005, Vol.34, n°5, pp.717-737. ⟨10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.009⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00480416

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().