Even Risk-Averters May Love Risk

Marco Scarsini and Alfred Müller

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: A decision maker bets on the outcomes of a sequence of coin-tossings. At the beginning of the game the decision maker can choose one of two coins to play the game. This initial choice is irreversible. The coins can be biased and the player is uncertain about the nature of one (or possibly both) coin(s). If the player is an expected-utility maximizer, her choice of the coin will depend on different elements: the nature of the game (namely, whether she can observe the outcomes of the previous tosses before making her next decision), her utility function, the prior distribution on the bias of the coin. We will show that even a risk averter might optimally choose a riskier coin when learning is allowed. We will express most of our results in the language of stochastic orderings, allowing comparisons that are valid for large classes of utility functions.

Keywords: Coin tossing; Exchangeable random variables; Games of chance; Learning; Risk Aversion; Stochastic comparison (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Theory and Decision, 2002, Vol. 52, N°1, pp. 81-99. ⟨10.1023/A:1015513000587⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Even Risk-Averters may Love Risk (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00539830

DOI: 10.1023/A:1015513000587

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().