 More firms, more competition? The case of the fourth operator in France's mobile phone marketPost-Print from HAL Abstract: To foster competition the French government authorized a fourth operator, ‘Free', to enter the country's mobile phone market at the end of 2009 alongside Orange, SFR and Bouygues Telecom (BT), who held respectively one-half, one-third and one-sixth of the market. By using a stylized model of France's phone market, we have examined what we call the regulator's nightmares and dreams. If Cournot competition is in place before Free's entry, minimizing the total profit fails to maximize the consumer surplus and the total surplus; the maximum most realistic price fall is 6.7% compared to three-way competition and could be 1.7% only; if Orange, SFR and Bouygues Telecom extend competition to Free, this situation will be sustainable. If Orange, SFR and Bouygues Telecom are in monopolistic cartel, an extension to a monopolistic cartel of four or a switching to four-way Cournot competition are equally unlikely; Orange, SFR and Bouygues Telecom can only place Free in their competitive fringe, which is not so bad for the regulator; however, Orange's incentives will push to four-way competition if Free is poorly competitive. Keywords: Mobile phone; New operator; Entry; GSM; 3G; Cartel.; Téléphone mobile; nouvel operateur; entrée; Cartel (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.12.011 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00546876 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Post-Print from HAL |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.