Dynamic versus static optimization of hedge fund portfolios: The relevance of performance measures

Rania Hentati (), Ameur Kaffel () and Jean-Luc Prigent
Additional contact information
Rania Hentati: CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper analyzes the relevance of a set of some performance measures for optimal portfolios including hedge funds. Four criteria are considered: the Sharpe Ratio, the Returns on VaR and on CVaR, and the Omega performance measure. The results are illustrated by an allocation on several indices: HFR (Global Hedge Fund Index), JPM Goverment Bond Index, S&P GSCI, MSCI World and the UBS Global Convertible. Both static and dynamic optimizations are considered. Due to the non-convexity of some of the criteria, we use the "threshold accepting algorithm" to solve numerically the optimization problems. The time period of the analysis is September 1997 to August 2007. Our results suggest that, for the dynamic optimization, the portfolio which maximizes the Omega measure has the more stable performances, in particular when compared to the Return-on-CVaR portfolio. As a by-product, we prove that all the optimal portfolios had to contain hedge funds for the time period 1997-2007.

Keywords: Hedge funds; CVaR; Tail risk; Omega measure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Published in International Journal of Business, 2010, 15 (1), pp.1-17

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Dynamic versus static optimization of hedge fund portfolios: The relevance of performance measures (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00608962

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().