Risk aversion elicitation: reconciling tractability and bias minimization

Olivier L'Haridon, Mohammed Abdellaoui and Ahmed Driouchi

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Risk attitude is known to be a key determinant of various economic and financial choices. Behavioral studies that aim to evaluate the role of risk attitudes in contexts of this type, therefore, require tools for measuring individual risk tolerance. Recent developments in decision theory provide such tools. However, the methods available can be time consuming. As a result, some practitioners might have an incentive to prefer "fast and frugal" methods to clean but more costly methods. In this article, we focus on a tractable procedure initially proposed by Holt and Laury (2002) to elicit risk attitude. We generalize this method to measure utility and risk aversion as follows. First, we allow measurement of probabilistic risk attitude through violations of expected utility due to probability weighting. Second, we use the outcome scale rather than the probability scale in the menu of choices. Third, we compare sure payoffs with lotteries instead of comparing non-degenerate lotteries. A within-subject experimental study illustrates the gains in tractability and bias minimization that can result from such an extension.

Keywords: Decision theory; Risk aversion; Risk attitudes; Elicitation methods; Prospect theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (70)

Published in Theory and Decision, 2011, 71 (1), pp.63-80. ⟨10.1007/s11238-009-9192-9⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Risk aversion elicitation: reconciling tractability and bias minimization (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00609543

DOI: 10.1007/s11238-009-9192-9

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().