A Meeting of Minds on Impact Assessment When Ex Ante Evaluation Meets Ex Post Judicial Control
Alberto Alemanno
Additional contact information
Alberto Alemanno: GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
This article aims at exploring the interactions that may arise from the European institutions' increasing reliance on ex ante evaluation mechanisms of proposed legislation, such as Impact Assessment (IA), and ex post judicial review of adopted legislation. IA, the privileged ex ante evaluation tool adopted by the EU to identify the expected effects of new legislation, by offering a 'legality check' of each Commission proposal well before its adoption, may serve - as illustrated by the recent judgments in Vodaphone and Afton - not only as 'aid to the legislator', but also as an 'aid to the parties' and an 'aid to court' within the ex post review of adopted legislation. After systematizing the different encounters that might occur between IA and judicial review, this article anticipates, by relying on a few examples, a 'meeting of minds' between the EU legislature and the judiciary on impact assessment.
Keywords: EU law; Better Regulation; Impact Assessment; Oversight; Judicial Review; European Court of Justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Published in European Public Law, 2011, 17 (3), pp.NC
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00628947
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).