The effect of mixed versus blocked sequencing of promotion and prevention features on brand evaluation: The moderating role of regulatory focus
Subimal Chatterjee,
Ashwin Vinod Malshe and
Timothy B. Heath
Additional contact information
Subimal Chatterjee: School of Management - Binghamton University [SUNY] - SUNY - State University of New York
Ashwin Vinod Malshe: School of Management - Binghamton University [SUNY] - SUNY - State University of New York
Timothy B. Heath: ESSEC Business School
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
We investigate if presenting a brand's promotion and prevention features in homogenous blocks (e.g., two promotion features followed by two prevention features -- a toothpaste that freshens breath, whitens teeth, stops plaque buildup and prevents cavities) as opposed to alternating their presentation order (a toothpaste that freshens breath, stops plaque buildup, whitens teeth, and prevents cavities) affects brand attitude. We find that alternating feature presentation improves brand evaluation among promotion-focused, but not prevention-focused, consumers. In mixed presentations, since each feature physically contrasts with those near it (e.g., promotion features bracketing a prevention feature), the resulting heightened distinctiveness increases the perceived variety of a brand's benefits and fits better with the advancement goals of promotion-focused consumers. We report two studies that support our predictions.
Keywords: Regulatory focus; Information sequence; Perceived variety; Brand attitude (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Published in Journal of Business Research, 2010, 63 (12), pp.1290-1294. ⟨10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.09.003⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00668815
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.09.003
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().