EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Direct Evidence on Income Comparisons and their Welfare Effects

Claudia Senik ()

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper provides direct evidence that income comparisons exert a significant impact on subjective well-being. It also evaluates the relative importance of different types of benchmarks. Internal comparisons to one's own past living standard outweigh any other comparison benchmarks. Local comparisons (to one's parents, former colleagues or high-school mates) are more powerful than self-ranking in the social ladder. The impact of comparisons is asymmetric: under-performing one's benchmark always has a greater welfare effect than out-performing it (in absolute value). Comparisons which reduce satisfaction also increase the demand for income redistribution, but there, the relative impact of subjective ranking is preponderant.

Keywords: C25; D31; D63; I31; J31; O57; P3; Z13; Subjective well-being; Income comparisons; Demand for income redistribution; Internal and external benchmarks; Transition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-05-13
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00696621
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (244)

Published in Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2009, 72 (1), pp.408. ⟨10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.019⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00696621/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Direct evidence on income comparisons and their welfare effects (2009) Downloads
Working Paper: Direct evidence on income comparisons and their welfare effects (2008) Downloads
Working Paper: Direct Evidence on Income Comparisons and their Welfare Effects (2007) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00696621

DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.019

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-02
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00696621