Improving performance evaluation metrics to manage innovative projects
Vincent Boly (),
Laure Morel () and
Mauricio Camargo ()
Additional contact information
Vincent Boly: ERPI - Equipe de Recherche sur les Processus Innovatifs - UL - Université de Lorraine
Laure Morel: ERPI - Equipe de Recherche sur les Processus Innovatifs - UL - Université de Lorraine
Mauricio Camargo: ERPI - Equipe de Recherche sur les Processus Innovatifs - UL - Université de Lorraine
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
As with any process, innovation requires control and evaluation operations in order to improve management practices. This research focuses on the concept of evaluation concerning innovation project management (from idea to launch). Indeed, literature attests to numerous productions in the field of project management and there are many software packages available. A performance benchmark conducted on the most successful software confirms that the project manager has few elements in relation to the characteristics of innovation, including: newness, uncertainty and learning. Consequently, this research fills the gap in the field of project reporting and evaluation of innovation. The research results are a list of variables to be followed by innovators throughout a project (in particular during the fuzzy front end).
Keywords: innovation; innovative projects; project management; evaluation operations; newness; customer integration; confrontation; performance evaluation; evaluation metric (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-08-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Published in International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2012, 8 (3), pp.215-230. ⟨10.1504/IJTIP.2012.048571⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00724126
DOI: 10.1504/IJTIP.2012.048571
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().