Estimating asset correlations from stock prices or default rates - which method is superior?

Klaus Duellmann (), Jonathan Küll () and Michael Kunisch ()
Additional contact information
Jonathan Küll: TH - Universität Karlsruhe

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper sets out to help explain why estimates of asset correlations based on equity prices tend to be considerably higher than estimates based on default rates. Resolving this empirical puzzle is highly important because, firstly, asset correlations are a key driver of credit risk and, secondly, both data sources are widely used to calibrate risk models of financial institutions. By means of a simulation study, we explore the hypothesis that differences in the correlation estimates are due to a substantial downward bias characteristic of estimates based on default rates. By varying the time horizon, the default probability, the asset correlation and the number of firms in the portfolio, we investigate these estimators in a systematic comparative study. Our results suggest that correlation estimates from equity returns are more efficient than those from default rates. This finding still holds if the model is misspecified such that asset correlations follow a Vasicek process which affects foremost the estimates from equity returns. The results lend support for the hypothesis that the downward bias of default-rate based estimates is an important although not the only factor to explain the differences in correlation estimates. Furthermore, our results help to quantify the estimation error of asset correlations dependent on the true values of default probability and asset correlation.

Keywords: Asset correlation; Single risk factor model; Small sample properties; Structural model; Basel II (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-09-29
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00736734
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Published in Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2010, 34 (11), pp.2341. ⟨10.1016/j.jedc.2010.06.003⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00736734/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00736734

DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2010.06.003

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().