Brand Confusion: Empirical Study of a Legal Concept

Jean-Noël Kapferer
Additional contact information
Jean-Noël Kapferer: HEC Paris - Recherche - Hors Laboratoire - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Each year, hundreds of own-label products appear on the shelves of major multiple retailers that "look" like successful brands. The close imitation of a national brand trade dress aims at creating a "halo of resemblance," on the basis of which consumers may make inferences and attributions of similarity of use, of content, if not of origin. In most countries, imitation is condemned if there is a risk of confusion. But the final decision as to whether or not such a risk exists is left up to the judge. The purpose of this paper is to test for the presence of confusion by means of a tachistoscopic experiment. It aims at bringing empirical data into the courtroom. Hence, it relies on the operational definition used by courts to evaluate the likelihood of confusion. This research demonstrates that the risk of confusion is real. It also shows how this confusion operates. Finally, it raises some important ethical issues in the face of the fact that many copied brands hesitate to engage lawsuits.

Keywords: Brand Confusion; Legal Concept (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1995-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Published in Psychology and Marketing, 1995, 12 (6), pp.551-568. ⟨10.1002/mar.4220120607⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00784110

DOI: 10.1002/mar.4220120607

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().