Does it Matter Which Citation Tool is Used to Compare the H-Index of a Group of Highly Cited Researchers?

Hadi Farhadi (), Hadi Salehi (), Melor Md Yunus (), Aghaei Chadegani Arezoo (), Maryam Farhadi (), Masood Fooladi () and Nader Ale Ebrahim
Additional contact information
Hadi Farhadi: UKM - Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Hadi Salehi: IAUN - Islamic Azad University, Najafabad branch
Melor Md Yunus: UKM - Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Aghaei Chadegani Arezoo: IAU, Mobarakeh - Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh - WTIAU - West Tehran Islamic Azad University [Tehran]
Masood Fooladi: IAU, Mobarakeh - Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh - Department of Accounting, Mobarakeh Branch

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: h-index retrieved by citation indexes (Scopus, Google scholar, and Web of Science) is used to measure the scientific performance and the research impact studies based on the number of publications and citations of a scientist. It also is easily available and may be used for performance measures of scientists, and for recruitment decisions. The aim of this study is to investigate the difference between the outputs and results from these three citation databases namely Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science based upon the h-index of a group of highly cited researchers (Nobel Prize winner scientist). The purposive sampling method was adopted to collect the required data. The results showed that there is a significant difference in the h-index between three citation indexes of Scopus, Google scholar, and Web of Science; the Google scholar h-index was more than the h-index in two other databases. It was also concluded that there is a significant positive relationship between h-indices based on Google scholar and Scopus. The citation indexes of Scopus, Google scholar, and Web of Science may be useful for evaluating h-index of scientists but they have some limitations as well.

Keywords: h-index; Scopus; Google Scholar; Web of Science; Nobel Prize; Physics; Chemistry; Economic Sciences.; Economic Sciences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his, nep-sea and nep-sog
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00830415
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Published in Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2013, 7 (4), pp.198-202

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00830415/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Does it Matter Which Citation Tool is Used to Compare the H-Index of a Group of Highly Cited Researchers? (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00830415

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().