Women can't jump?-An experiment on competitive attitudes and stereotype threat
Christina Günther,
Neslihan Arslan Ekinci,
Christiane Schwieren and
Martin Strobel
Additional contact information
Neslihan Arslan Ekinci: (r)evolution
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Gneezy et al. (2003) offer a partial explanation for the wage gap between men and women. In an experiment they found that women react less to competitive incentives. The task they used in their experiment can however be considered a male task. We replicate the experiment and extend it by treatments with a gender neutral task and a female task. For the male task we replicate their results, but for the neutral task women react as strongly to incentives than men and for the female task women react stronger than men. Our findings suggest a stereotype threat explanation. Women tend not to compete with men in areas where they (rightly or wrongly) think that they will lose anyway-and the same holds for men, although to a lower extent.
Keywords: Gender differences; competition; stereotype threat (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-07-31
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00849415
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (85)
Published in Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2010, 75 (3), pp.395. ⟨10.1016/j.jebo.2010.05.003⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00849415/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Women can't jump?--An experiment on competitive attitudes and stereotype threat (2010) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00849415
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2010.05.003
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().