Evaluation moderne, évaluation modeste ? Le cas des pôles de compétitivité français

Emilie-Pauline Gallié, Glaser Anna (), Philippe Lefebvre () and Frédérique Pallez
Additional contact information
Emilie-Pauline Gallié: IMRI - Institut pour le management de la recherche et de l'innovation - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres
Philippe Lefebvre: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Frédérique Pallez: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Public policy evaluations constitute a current topic among practitioners and academics working on public action. However, beyond a mutual agreement on the principles of evaluation, there is hardly any stabilisation of evaluation doctrines and practices. Different models coexist, according to the country and the period. Basing our analysis on the evaluation of the French cluster policy in 2008, we highlight the main difficulties of the evaluation process, which are linked to the systemic, multi-actor and heterogeneous character of a "cluster". Through the analysis of how the results of the evaluation are used, we then show that this evaluation takes part of a progressive construction of doctrine on what a cluster is and how it should be managed. In conclusion, we build the basis of an evaluation framework, in which evaluation is integrated in a larger public policy management process.

Keywords: Public policy; competitiveness pole; Politique publique; évaluation; pôle de compétitivité; cluster (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Politiques et Management public, 2012, n°29/4, pp. 573-590

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00867266

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().