EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Cultural differences and board gender diversity

Amélia Carrasco, Claude Francoeur, Isabelle Réal, Joaquina Laffarga and Emiliano Ruiz-Barbadillo
Additional contact information
Amélia Carrasco: Universidad de Sevilla = University of Seville
Claude Francoeur: HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal, GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Isabelle Réal: HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal, GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Joaquina Laffarga: Universidad de Sevilla = University of Seville
Emiliano Ruiz-Barbadillo: Department of Biology [Univ. of Cadiz] - UCA - Universidad de Cádiz = University of Cádiz

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: As evidence of the continuing interest raised by "board gender diversity", major studies (Catalyst, 2008; World Economic Forum, 2010; European Board Diversity Analysis, 2010) were recently carried out and have all led to reports confirming the imbalance of women on boards and the need to address this issue. Moreover, our analysis of these reports indicates that the low proportion of women observed on corporate boards varies across countries, which raises the question as to why? Based on institutional theory and the two sets of cultural dimensions proposed by Hofstede (1980) and House (2004), this study hypothesizes and tests whether this variation can be attributed to differences in the cultural settings. Our analysis of the representation of women on board for 5 European countries during 2006 reveals that the culture of a country indeed explains the observed differences. Of the cultural dimensions examined, power distance or a tolerance of inequality, uncertainty avoidance or a lack of tolerance for ambiguity, and masculinity or a preference for domination versus cooperation in superior/subordinate relationships have the highest explicative power for the differences in representation of women on boards that are observed around the world.

Keywords: Culture; boards of directors; gender; gender diversity; diversity; cross-country; corporate governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-05-21
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00937923
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Comptabilités et innovation, May 2012, Grenoble, France. pp.cd-rom

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00937923/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00937923

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00937923