Does uncertainty matter for loan charge-offs?

Laetitia Lepetit, Frank Strobel and David G. Dickinson
Additional contact information
David G. Dickinson: University of Birmingham [Birmingham]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Using a stylized real options model, we show that discretion over the timing of charging off a non-performing loan could be economically justified when collateral values are uncertain and there is a chance of loan recovery. The implied hypothesis of an "uncertainty dependence" aspect in loan charge-offs is empirically tested and validated using a panel of European banks. A welfare-maximizing regulator might want to let banks pursue such discretionary loan charge-off behavior, with the problem of distinguishing it from alternative capital management and income smoothing objectives, while transparency-seeking accounting standards setters would presumably not.

Keywords: Discretion; Loan charge-off; Uncertainty dependence; Real option (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01098926v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Published in Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2012, 22, pp.264 - 277. ⟨10.1016/j.intfin.2011.09.006⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01098926v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Does uncertainty matter for loan charge-offs? (2012)
Working Paper: Does uncertainty matter for loan charge-offs ? (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01098926

DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2011.09.006

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().