System-justifying motives can lead to both the acceptance and the rejection of innate explanations for group differences

Eric Luis Uhlmann, Luke Lei Zhu, Victoria L. Brescoll and George E. Newman
Additional contact information
Eric Luis Uhlmann: GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Luke Lei Zhu: UBC - University of British Columbia [Canada]
Victoria L. Brescoll: Yale School of Management - Yale University [New Haven]
George E. Newman: Yale School of Management - Yale University [New Haven]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Recent experimental evidence indicates that intuitions about inherence and system justification are distinct psychological processes, and that the inherence heuristic supplies important explanatory frameworks that are accepted or rejected based on their consistency with one's motivation to justify the system.

Keywords: inherence; system justification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2014, 37 (5), pp.503-504. ⟨10.1017/S0140525X13003890⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01099627

DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X13003890

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().