Food sovereignty and agricultural trade policy commitments: how much leeway do West African nations have?

Catherine Laroche-Dupraz () and Angèle Postolle
Additional contact information
Catherine Laroche-Dupraz: SMART-LERECO - Structures et Marché Agricoles, Ressources et Territoires - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - AGROCAMPUS OUEST
Angèle Postolle: UMR MOISA - Marchés, Organisations, Institutions et Stratégies d'Acteurs - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - Montpellier SupAgro - Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques - CIHEAM-IAMM - Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier - CIHEAM - Centre International de Hautes Études Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier, Ecole Supérieure d'Agriculture (Groupe ESA), Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Catherine Laroche Dupraz

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The 2008 food crisis has challenged the political legitimacy and economic efficiency of the liberalization of international agricultural trade. An alternative vision defended by the food sovereignty movement is that long-term food security cannot rely on dependency on food imports, but must be built on the development of domestic production with enough barrier protection to shelter it from world price fluctuations and unfair trading. The purpose of this paper is to look into whether the West African nations can achieve food sovereignty given their various trade commitments and other external constraints. The particularity of our approach is to combine a historical economic analysis with a political approach to food sovereignty and trade commitments. Our results suggest that external brakes on the development of food sovereignty policies are marginal, as the countries still have unused room for manoeuvre to protect their smallholder agriculture under the terms of draft World Trade Organization agreements and Economic Partnership Agreements and under the international financial institutions' recommendations. Rather the international environment seems to be instrumented by West African states that do not manage to secure a national political consensus to drive structural reforms deemed vital and further the food security of the urban populations over the marginalized rural populations. Recently, the regional integration process has made headway with a common agricultural support and protection policy project that could herald an internal political balance more conducive to food-producing agriculture.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Published in Food Policy, 2013, 38, pp.115-125. ⟨10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.11.005⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Food sovereignty and agricultural trade policy commitments: How much leeway do West African nations have? (2013)
Working Paper: Food sovereignty and agricultural trade policy commitments: how much leeway do West African nations have? (2011)
Working Paper: Food sovereignty and agricultural trade policy commitments: How much leeway do West African nations have? (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01208839

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.11.005

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().