Decision evaluation process in end-of-life systems management

Yasmina Bouzarour-Amokrane, Ayeley Tchangani () and François Pérès ()
Additional contact information
Yasmina Bouzarour-Amokrane: LGP - Laboratoire Génie de Production - ENIT - Ecole Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Tarbes - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - UT - Université de Toulouse
Ayeley Tchangani: UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT - Université de Toulouse
François Pérès: LGP - Laboratoire Génie de Production - ENIT - Ecole Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Tarbes - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - UT - Université de Toulouse

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In manufacturing sectors, firms are paying an increasing attention to sustainability concept with regard to their end-of-life products in order to respect environmental norms and satisfy the consumer sensitivity. This practise allows creating value by reintroducing dismantling and recovering parts and/or materials of end-of-life products into manufacturing process, or into maintenance process. Thus, deconstruction processes are developed in order to examine all activities addressing the end of life (EOL) systems to ensure its disposal according to environmental constraints when seeking an economic optimum. In this context, one of the first tasks to perform is to repatriate the EOL systems at lowest cost considering geographical optimization of treatment centers. Considering this point, the present paper proposes an evaluation and optimization approach for the withdrawal location process in the field of aircraft dismantling. Given the multitude and heterogeneity of characteristics to be taken into account, we propose to consider dismantling site location problem as multi-criteria/multi-objectives decision making problem and solve it using a new AHP-BOCR approach based on qualitative and quantitative evaluations. A bipolar structuring framework is considered to distinguish positive and negative aspects in the elicitation/evaluation process to avoid compensation and satisficing game theory is used as suitable mathematical tool for recommendation process. An experimental study is carried out to show the usefulness of the framework.

Keywords: End-of-life product management; Reverse logistics; Withdrawal plan; BOCR analysis; Satisficing game (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cse
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01308899v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2015, vol. 37 (n° 3), pp. 715-728. ⟨10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.03.007⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01308899v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01308899

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.03.007

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().