 «Cité ou oublié»: les supports de la notoriété des professeurs en sciences de gestion vus à travers Google ScholarPost-Print from HAL Abstract: Standards for the evaluation of management scholars lead more and more to exclude forms of scientific production other than the articles published in international scientific journals. The aim of this paper is to test the validity of these norms by analyzing the production of all university professors in management science, based on the «influen- tial» publications in Google Scholar. The articles published in internation- al journals represent only 35 % of in- fluential publications and collect only 40.2 % of citations. Books still repre- sent a very important part and the in- fluence of the different media varies widely across sub-disciplinary fields (finance, marketing, etc.). This article also highlights that only 76 publica- tions obtain at least 100 citations and that the standing of the journal has only weak explanatory power in pre- dicting the number of citations obtained. Keywords: evaluation of academics; influential publications; publications influentes; classement des revues; CNRS journal ranking; évaluation des enseignants-chercheurs (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 2011, 14 (4), pp.129-166 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01346771 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Post-Print from HAL |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.