la part maudite: un "non savoir" économique ?

François de March ()
Additional contact information
François de March: LIRSA - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en sciences de l'action - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This article explores the very limited interest in La part maudite by professional economists despite the fact that Bataille considered this book to be a work on "political economics". Was he just trying to provoke or should this be taken seriously ? What is tbe substance of this book ? The argumentation is based on the epistemologicat dispute revealed by the exchange between Bataille and François Perroux - tbe only economist to have debated this issue with the author during his lifetime.

Keywords: Georges Bataille; François Perroux; La Part maudite; épistémologie; dépense improductive (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in La Part maudite de Georges Bataille : La dépense et l'excès (Ouvrage collectif sous la direction de Christian Limousin et Jacques Poirier), Série Littérature des XXe et XXIe siècles (124), CLASSIQUES GARNIER, pp.119-134, 2015, RENCONTRES, 978-2-8124-3829-5

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01385179

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().