Economics at your fingertips  

Separate aggregation of beliefs and values under ambiguity

Xiangyu Qu

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Maximin expected utility model for individual decision making under ambiguity prescribes that the individual posits independently a utility function and a set of probability distributions over events to represent the values and belief, respectively. It assumes that individual evaluates each act on the basis of its minimum expected utility over this class of distributions. In this paper, we attempt to generalize the model to social decision making. It is assumed that the society's belief is formed through a linear aggregation of individual beliefs and society's values through a linear aggregation of individual values. We propose principles which characterize such separate aggregation procedures. We also generalize Choquet expected utility model, which posits a nonadditive measure over events and a utility function to represent belief and values, respectively. We prove that the only aggregation procedures that respect our principles are the separate linear aggregations of beliefs and values

Keywords: Maximin expected utility; Choquet expected utility; Ambiguity; Aggregation of Preferences; Linear aggregation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-02
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server:
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed

Published in Economic Theory, Springer Verlag, 2017, 63 (2), pp.503-519. ⟨10.1007/s00199-015-0944-1⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Separate aggregation of beliefs and values under ambiguity (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Separate aggregation of beliefs and values under ambiguity (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

DOI: 10.1007/s00199-015-0944-1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

Page updated 2020-08-09
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01437441