Economic freedom and public, non-market institutions: evidence from criminal prosecution

Claudio Detotto and Bryan McCannon

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Economic freedom, which measures the protection of property and freedom to contract, is generally argued to capture the quality of a state's institutions regarding market activity. As to be expected, numerous studies have found that economic freedom is associated with good economic outcomes. Additionally, much effort in public economics has worked to identify the features of quality non-market public institutions. No effort has been made to connect institutions that influence market activity and institutions that govern non-market activities. We take a first step. We employ a linear programming method for measuring relative efficiencies known as Data Envelopment Analysis. We apply this technique to information on the use of inputs to the production of the prosecution of crime across the thousands of local prosecutor offices in the U.S. We then compare state-level measurements of prosecution productivity with data on state-level economic freedom from the Economic Freedom of North America index. We show that there is a positive and statistically significant relationship between the two. Those states that develop institutions respecting economic freedom also tend to be the states that develop efficient publicly-provided services. The results are extended to complementary economic freedom measurements.

Keywords: Data envelopment analysis; Economic freedom; EfficiencyProsecution; Publicly-provided services (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Economics of Governance, 2016, pp. 1-22. ⟨10.1007/s10101-016-0183-3⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Economic freedom and public, non-market institutions: evidence from criminal prosecution (2017)
Working Paper: Economic Freedom and Public, Non-Market Institutions: Evidence from Criminal Prosecution (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01468069

DOI: 10.1007/s10101-016-0183-3

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().