Does Aggregate Uncertainty Explain Size and Value Anomalies?
Sofiane Aboura () and
Yakup Arisoy ()
Post-Print from HAL
This paper examines the impact of aggregate uncertainty on return dynamics of size and book-to-market ratio sorted portfolios. Using VVIX as a proxy for aggregate uncertainty, and controlling for market risk, volatility risk, correlation risk and the variance risk premium, we document significant portfolio return exposures to aggregate uncertainty. In particular, portfolios that contain small and value stocks have significant and negative uncertainty betas, whereas portfolios of large and growth stocks exhibit positive and significant uncertainty betas. Using a quasi-natural experimental setting around the financial crisis, we confirm the differential sensitivity of small versus big and value versus growth portfolios to aggregate uncertainty. We posit that due to their negative uncertainty betas, uncertainty-averse investors demand extra compensation to hold small and value stocks. Our results offer an uncertainty-based explanation to size and value anomalies.
Keywords: Uncertainty; vol-of-vol; VVIX; size; value; G01; G10; G11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01488305
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2016, ⟨10.1080/00036846.2016.1257107⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Journal Article: Does aggregate uncertainty explain size and value anomalies? (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01488305
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().