Economics at your fingertips  

Contaminated sites and land use acceptability

Acceptabilité des choix d’aménagements des friches urbaines polluées

Béatrice Plottu () and Marjorie Tendero
Additional contact information
Béatrice Plottu: GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - AGROCAMPUS OUEST - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - Institut National de l'Horticulture et du Paysage

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Brownfield redevelopment provides opportunities to build sustainable cities for the future. However, potential benefits of brownfield redevelopment are underestimated whereas costs are overestimated; brownfields are therefore barelyreused. Besides, economic valuation methods are struggling to determine ex ante benefits and in particularly collective benefits and those which are related to non-direct use. In order to address these limitations, we develop an original methodological framework which combines economic valuation techniques that are available. Focus groups and discrete choice experiment are first employed to assess individual risk attitudes and preferences, and then multi-criteria decision analysis is used to compare individual preferences with collective preferences in order to determine a consensual solution in the case of a brownfield redevelopment project. This methodological approach should improve ex-antestakeholders' involvement and hence social acceptability of land-use plans.

Keywords: multicriteria decision aid; discrete choice experi ment; brownfields; participatory proces; aide multicritère à la décision; expérience à choix discrets; friches urbaines polluées; processus participatif (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-04
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server:
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Published in Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, 2017, pp.335-353

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

Page updated 2020-09-21
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01518732