The Open Innovation Paradigm: from Outsourcing to Open-sourcing in Shenzhen, China

Valérie Fernandez (), Gilles Puel () and Clément Renaud
Additional contact information
Valérie Fernandez: I3 SES - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation de Telecom Paris - Télécom Paris - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Clément Renaud: I3 SES - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation de Telecom Paris - Télécom Paris - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Having once been the headquarters of ‘Made in China,' Shenzhen's industry is currently undergoing profound change. The appearance of new urban places for technological innovation is reviving the ageing industrial processes of this manufacturing city. It is supposed to transform Shenzhen into the Silicon Valley of hardware. Two groups, one local, the shanzhai community made up of entrepreneurs and companies historically based on a strategy of imitating high end products, and the other, a more international maker community, are thought to be the main drivers of this change using values of ‘open innovation'. The building of this ecosystem relies largely on practices associated with being open-source. Like in California, open innovation contributed to the creation of resources for the development of a vast high-tech industry. This ethnographic field study shows how, while both communities, the international makers and the shanzhai, draw on open innovation, they do not have the same values. For the shanzhai, open innovation means total deregulation and a kind of coopetition that poorly masks fierce competition. For the makers, open innovation does not entirely eliminate the classic tension between ‘open' and ‘closed' commons in the world of makers. These two communities still rarely collaborate.

Keywords: Open innovation; New urban places; Makers; Shanzhai; Shenzhen (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-10-15
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 2016, 4 (4), pp.27 - 41. ⟨10.14246/irspsd.4.4_27⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01525247

DOI: 10.14246/irspsd.4.4_27

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().