What about books in the evaluation process

Julienne Brabet () and Thomas Durand ()
Additional contact information
Julienne Brabet: IAE Paris Est Créteil - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Paris Est Créteil - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12
Thomas Durand: UPMC - Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP] - AP-HP - Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) - SU - Sorbonne Université

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: What is the role of books or monographs and of their evaluation as scientific production in the field of management? Can a published book by a researcher in management be considered to be a scholarly production or even a scientific publication? If yes, under which conditions, to what extent and how? Raising the question of the legitimacy of management books as scientific production in their own right, we also inquire into the wider issue of the means of evaluation and their impact on research -for certain productions are discouraged (field research for example) while others are wholly encouraged ( questionnaire surveys and databases analysis for example) by the privileged format of publication.

Keywords: Books; research; management; evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Dameron, Stéphanie, and Thomas Durand, eds. Redesigning management education and research: Challenging proposals from European scholars. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011., 2011, 978 0 85793 358 4

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01532440

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().