Forecasting crude-oil market volatility: Further evidence with jumps
Amélie Charles () and
Olivier Darné
Additional contact information
Amélie Charles: Audencia Recherche - Audencia Business School
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
This paper analyzes volatility models and their forecasting abilities in the presence of jumps in two crude-oil markets-Brent and West Texas Intermediate (WTI)-between January 6th 1992 and December 31st 2014. We compare a number of GARCH-type models that capture short memory as well as asymmetry (GARCH, GJR-GARCH and EGARCH), estimated on raw returns, to three competing approaches that deal with the presence of jumps: GARCH-type models estimated on jump-filtered returns, and two new classes of volatility models, called Generalized Autoregressive Score (GAS) and Markov-switching multifractal (MSM) models, estimated using raw returns. The forecasting performance of these volatility models is evaluated using the model confidence set approach, which allows us to identify a subset of models that outperform all the other competing models. We find that asymmetric models estimated on filtered returns provide better out-of-sample forecasts than do GARCH-, GAS-type and MSM models estimated on raw return series for Brent and WTI returns.
Keywords: Crude oil returns; Volatility forecasting; Jumps (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-09
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://audencia.hal.science/hal-01598141
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (39)
Published in Energy Economics, 2017, ⟨10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.002⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://audencia.hal.science/hal-01598141/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Forecasting crude-oil market volatility: Further evidence with jumps (2017) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01598141
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.002
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().