Achievable or unbelievable? Expert perceptions of the European Union targets for emissions, renewables, and efficiency

Yannick Perez (), Tahamina Khanam, Abul Rahman, Blas Mola-Yudego, Paavo Pelkonen and Jouni Pykäläinen
Additional contact information
Tahamina Khanam: University of Eastern Finland
Abul Rahman: University of Eastern Finland
Blas Mola-Yudego: SLU - Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences = Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
Paavo Pelkonen: University of Eastern Finland
Jouni Pykäläinen: University of Eastern Finland

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In 2007, the European Union (EU) set goals to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, called H2020 targets, by 2020. Following the adoption and implementation of policies related to these targets, this study surveyed 187 experts from 25 EU countries to analyse their perceptions regarding the achievement of the H2020 targets. The experts' countries are grouped in five geographical regions: Central European countries (CEC), Western European countries (WEC), South-Eastern European countries (SEEC), Nordic countries (NC), and East European countries (EEC). The survey results demonstrate a broad scepticism among those interviewed: 49% perceive that the renewable energy (RE) target will not be accomplished, 60% perceive that the EU's GHG emission policies are not sufficient to fulfil the GHG reduction target, and 85% state that the EU's energy efficiency will not succeed. The regional comparison reveals that an overwhelming majority (82–93%) from SEEC, NC, and EEC feel that consistent and sufficient incentives are necessary to meet the RE targets for biomass. Contrary to the majority opinion among WEC experts, the majority from all other regions perceive that the EU GHG policies are insufficient and that the H2020 targets will not be achieved.

Keywords: H2020 targets; Greenhouse gas; Renewable energy; Energy efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Published in Energy Research & Social Science, 2017, 34, pp.144 - 153. ⟨10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.040⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01660220

DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.040

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().