Démocratie et justice sociale: Arrow-Harsanyi- Rawls-Sen, un quatuor dissonant
Post-Print from HAL
Is social justice congruent with democracy? Are utilitarianism and welfare economics compatible with political liberalism? Salient disagreements between welfare economics and political philosophy focus upon the choice of principles of justice in a democratic society, and sustainability thereof remains an open question. Arrow's theorem establishes the impossibility of grounding a social welfare function upon individual preferences. Harsanyi's rule-utilitarianism builds a welfare function upon Bayesian expected utility. Rawls's contractarian theory of justice upholds the priority of the right over the good. Sen's theory of social choice rejects the compatibility of the Pareto principle with political liberalism.
Keywords: democracy; justice; political liberalism; social choice; utilitarianism; welfare; préférences; utilitarisme; libéralisme politique; Bien-être; choix social; démocratie; I32; D71; JEL Classification: D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01672892
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Éthique et économique/Ethics and economics, Éthique et économique, 2016
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01672892
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().